|
I'm not sure why people would need to edit the news articles? the first example I looked at on that site was someone editing someone else's article by writing cuss words and obscene language. Even though I've said before that Pligg doesn't really have a direction it's going I think that for sites like digg and pligg there's really no point in letting everyone edit everyone else's stories. I think it's great for sites like wikipedia but not for story driven sites like Pligg.
There's a queued section for a reason. If the stories are inaccurate then you don't vote for them. There's no need to edit them if no one votes for them to be on the front page. Like I said, a wiki idea works great for encyclopedia sites like wikipedia but not for story driven sites like digg and pligg.
__________________
I accept donations for my time helping users like you on the forum and IRC.
|