[tbones]

Originally Posted by AnAlienHolakres3

Thanks man.

You´re welcome. Good work deserves it.

Originally Posted by AnAlienHolakres3

1) Rating and versioning
It is important to know subject of rating is the task not taskfiles. User is allowed to change his own rating if task quality was improved.
Task quality = quality of task files + related links + related comments.

Ok, so the user has to check whether anything changed. If that happens she/he has to decide whether the changes still deserve the given rating.

Originally Posted by AnAlienHolakres3

2) Category
In Live demo there is only one category, but if your Pligg site has many categories then it is great thing. My primary site VŠElink / Schválené novinky has many categories - school subjects. And for every school subject there can be created team, you can filter that. To be simple it is for better identification.

I understand: You get an idea of the rough focus of a team and it allows to group teams by that focus.

I´m doing also in education: I use a Pligg instance as electronic portfolio (
Developing a Teaching Portfolio - not my work, just an english information). Stories are pieces of that portfolio. It´s a product-oriented portfolio. Using your mod with revisions could be a first step towards a process-oriented portfolio.

I´m pretty interested in your shoutbox because I need some sort of a shoutbox but with a rating possibility for every message (part of reflexion). Therefore I thought about an auto-refresh for the Pligg comments.

Do you think you could implement your shoutbox refresh code into comments?